<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The economics of word-count requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/</link>
	<description>From Dorchester Publishing Editor Leah Hultenschmidt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: how to make money with writing</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>how to make money with writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>Hi. I just noticed that this page doesn&#039;t display correctly in my browser. Oh well, I think I&#039;ll just used the tried and tested Internet Explorer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I just noticed that this page doesn&#8217;t display correctly in my browser. Oh well, I think I&#8217;ll just used the tried and tested Internet Explorer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; A rant on word count</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; A rant on word count</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-646</guid>
		<description>[...] http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/" rel="nofollow">http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: March 15, 2009 Little Romance Times &#171; Everybody Needs A Little Romance</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>March 15, 2009 Little Romance Times &#171; Everybody Needs A Little Romance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] ♥Wordcounts at Dorchester and why you shouldn&#8217;t query a 2,000 page book! Wordcount is a shrinking, folks! Make EVERY WORD COUNT! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ♥Wordcounts at Dorchester and why you shouldn&#8217;t query a 2,000 page book! Wordcount is a shrinking, folks! Make EVERY WORD COUNT! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Blake</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-164</guid>
		<description>This actually comes as a relief to me. Pal agent/author Lois Winston told me to aim for 90,000 words, minimum 85,000. And I&#039;m at 77,000 and running out of outline :-)
So the fact that shorter might turn out to be better is a load off my mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This actually comes as a relief to me. Pal agent/author Lois Winston told me to aim for 90,000 words, minimum 85,000. And I&#8217;m at 77,000 and running out of outline <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
So the fact that shorter might turn out to be better is a load off my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Deborah - a book won&#039;t be turned down as long as it&#039;s reasonably within the stated word-count requirements (and well-written, of course).  I think the Dorchester website lists 80,000-90,000 or maybe even 95,000.  

I just bought a historical from a debut author that&#039;s around the 105,000 mark.  There are a few spots that can stand some trimming, so we&#039;ll do our best to get it down.  But there&#039;s no way to cut it to 85,000 without taking away part of its appeal. It might mean a slightly smaller font for the finished book or a higher page count than Production wants for a new author, or that Sales will decide to charge a dollar more (unlikely, but possible) but the length isn&#039;t insurmountable.  

The reason I let folks know now is so they don&#039;t have to worry about that cutting in the future.  Some publishers have now gone from 80,000 to 65,000.  So keep an eye on those guidelines when sending around submissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah &#8211; a book won&#8217;t be turned down as long as it&#8217;s reasonably within the stated word-count requirements (and well-written, of course).  I think the Dorchester website lists 80,000-90,000 or maybe even 95,000.  </p>
<p>I just bought a historical from a debut author that&#8217;s around the 105,000 mark.  There are a few spots that can stand some trimming, so we&#8217;ll do our best to get it down.  But there&#8217;s no way to cut it to 85,000 without taking away part of its appeal. It might mean a slightly smaller font for the finished book or a higher page count than Production wants for a new author, or that Sales will decide to charge a dollar more (unlikely, but possible) but the length isn&#8217;t insurmountable.  </p>
<p>The reason I let folks know now is so they don&#8217;t have to worry about that cutting in the future.  Some publishers have now gone from 80,000 to 65,000.  So keep an eye on those guidelines when sending around submissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Blake</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I am currently working on a paranormal humorous romance with lots of short chapters. But I just figure that if a publisher wants me to combine some to make longer chapters, they&#039;ll ask me to. I&#039;d hate to think that the book would be turned down just for such a small, fixable issue. (It&#039;s only going to end up being 80,000-85,000 words anyway.) Do you ever ask people to change such things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently working on a paranormal humorous romance with lots of short chapters. But I just figure that if a publisher wants me to combine some to make longer chapters, they&#8217;ll ask me to. I&#8217;d hate to think that the book would be turned down just for such a small, fixable issue. (It&#8217;s only going to end up being 80,000-85,000 words anyway.) Do you ever ask people to change such things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-160</guid>
		<description>How in the world did someone keep a plot thread going for 2000 pages in one book? And what about pacing??? Besides the cost factor to print said book, or the need for a super magnifier to read the font required...

Leah, although I use computer word count, I never thought about short chapters and lots of dialogue as causing the need for extra pages in the printing process. Good to know. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world did someone keep a plot thread going for 2000 pages in one book? And what about pacing??? Besides the cost factor to print said book, or the need for a super magnifier to read the font required&#8230;</p>
<p>Leah, although I use computer word count, I never thought about short chapters and lots of dialogue as causing the need for extra pages in the printing process. Good to know. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Sandy - excellent question.  I generally use the computer word count as a rough guide, basically just to let me know if we&#039;re in the right ballpark.  But it&#039;s really not just word count that affects the size of the book--and I&#039;m glad you brought it up because I should have mentioned it in the post.  Having short chapters--and therefore a lot of them--makes for a longer book.  Also, short paragraphs and/or lots of dialogue won&#039;t necessarily raise any red flags in the word count but can definitely stretch out those pages.

I&#039;m not saying don&#039;t have short chapters or lots of quick dialogue.  I think both are great pacing techniques, but it&#039;s something to be aware of.  Our Production Dept. can always tweak font size (though I hate, hate, hate small type!) or finangle things in number of different ways once the book itself is as tight as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy &#8211; excellent question.  I generally use the computer word count as a rough guide, basically just to let me know if we&#8217;re in the right ballpark.  But it&#8217;s really not just word count that affects the size of the book&#8211;and I&#8217;m glad you brought it up because I should have mentioned it in the post.  Having short chapters&#8211;and therefore a lot of them&#8211;makes for a longer book.  Also, short paragraphs and/or lots of dialogue won&#8217;t necessarily raise any red flags in the word count but can definitely stretch out those pages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying don&#8217;t have short chapters or lots of quick dialogue.  I think both are great pacing techniques, but it&#8217;s something to be aware of.  Our Production Dept. can always tweak font size (though I hate, hate, hate small type!) or finangle things in number of different ways once the book itself is as tight as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Kreger</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Kreger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-157</guid>
		<description>2,000 pages?  Ouch.  That is one serious wordcount!

Interesting, but not surprising.  With the cost of everything rising, I can totally see smaller books for awhile.  The question is ... will that page count ever rise again once the economy stablizes?

I used to joke with hubby about the price of gas when it began to rise of $1.00 and everyone was bitching - big time.  I told him outright that it was going to go to $2.00 and more (easily) and that when it drops to $1.50 no one is gonna bitch because they&#039;ll be happy with it at $1.50.  Its so true right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2,000 pages?  Ouch.  That is one serious wordcount!</p>
<p>Interesting, but not surprising.  With the cost of everything rising, I can totally see smaller books for awhile.  The question is &#8230; will that page count ever rise again once the economy stablizes?</p>
<p>I used to joke with hubby about the price of gas when it began to rise of $1.00 and everyone was bitching &#8211; big time.  I told him outright that it was going to go to $2.00 and more (easily) and that when it drops to $1.50 no one is gonna bitch because they&#8217;ll be happy with it at $1.50.  Its so true right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://romanticreads.net/2009/03/12/the-economics-of-word-count-requirements/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticreads.net/?p=499#comment-156</guid>
		<description>So, are we talking 80K - 85K in computer wordcount or traditional wordcount?

Someone publishers are going to computer wordcount, just wondering what&#039;s Dorchester&#039;s position.

Thanks,
Sandy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are we talking 80K &#8211; 85K in computer wordcount or traditional wordcount?</p>
<p>Someone publishers are going to computer wordcount, just wondering what&#8217;s Dorchester&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sandy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
